Ministry of Defence

Supplement to the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body Report 2017

Sir Michael Fallon: The Supplement to the 2017 Report of the Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body (AFPRB) making recommendations on the pay of Service Medical and Dental Officers has been published today. I wish to express my thanks to the Chairman and members of the Review Body for their Report.The AFPRB’s recommendations are accepted in full with implementation effective from 1 April 2017. Copies of the AFPRB Supplementary Report are available in the Vote Office.

Cabinet Office

Government Response to Senior Salaries Review Body Recommendations for 2017/18

Damian Green: The 39th report of the Senior Salaries Review Body is being published today. This makes recommendations about the pay of the senior civil service, senior military officers, the judiciary, and Executive and Senior Managers in the Department of Health’s Arm’s Length Bodies.The Government greatly values the important work that public servants do in delivering essential public services. We understand the need to ensure that we are able to recruit, retain and motivate staff with the right skills and experience. However, there is a trade-off between pay and jobs in many public services, and pay restraint is one of the many difficult choices the Government has had to make to help put the UK's public finances back on track. Senior public sector workers, like everyone else, will have to continue to play their part to ensure we deliver job security for working people across the country. This will help us to strike the right balance between protecting people’s jobs, being fair to public sector workers and being fair to those who pay for it.Senior Military Officers The Government has accepted the recommendation of a 1 per cent increase to senior military salaries with effect from 1 April 2017. The Government has also accepted the recommendation that there is no change to the current pay differentials for senior medical and dental officers.Judiciary The Government accepts the review body’s recommendation of a 1 per cent salary increase for the Judiciary.Senior Civil ServiceThe Government accepts the recommendation on developing innovative pay and workforce proposals. The Government supports the development of workforce strategies and supporting reward objectives within public sector pay policy. The Government agrees that there is a need to target resources to address any specific recruitment and retention issues that arise and that there should be a greater focus on the total reward package. This will ensure the right balance between ongoing pay restraint and the need to attract and retain people of the right calibre.The Government accepts the recommendation on using the 1 per cent award in full. Workforce groups will implement the average 1 per cent award in full unless there is a strong rationale to do otherwise.In line with the SSRB recommendation, the Government will keep under review the evidence for making pension packages more flexible, alongside the fiscal implications.The Government accepts the recommendation to conduct a review of the Senior Civil Service pay framework. The Government invites the Senior Salaries Review Body to contribute towards the review of the Senior Civil Service pay framework that the Cabinet Office is currently undertaking. The Cabinet Office would welcome any expertise that the Senior Salaries Review Body can provide on this review over the coming months. The intention is that the outcome of this review will underpin fully considered proposals for a more strategic approach to Senior Civil Service pay in the Government’s evidence to the SSRB, with the potential that some recommendations could be implemented from April 2018.Executive and Senior Managers in the Department of Health’s Arm’s Length Bodies The Government accepts the recommendation that the 1 per cent available for basic increases this year is used in full for Executive and Senior Managers in the Department of Health’s Arm’s Length Bodies, unless there is a strong and explicit rationale to do otherwise.The Government accepts the Senior Salaries Review Body’s recommendation that Arm’s Length Bodies use the whole available budget for non-consolidated awards for the top 25 per cent performers and that any individual Arm’s Length Bodies who decide not use their full allocation must make a formal case to the Department of Health Remuneration Committee explaining the rationale for their decision.The Government accepts the SSRB’s recommendation to develop a coherent proposition on how best to set the pay of Executive and Senior Managers in the Department of Health’s Arm’s length Bodies in the future and agrees with the recommendation that Executive and Senior Managers are removed from the Senior Salaries Review Body remit whilst a scoping exercise is undertaken to consider the inclusion of Very Senior Managers in the wider NHS.The Government accepts the Senior Salaries Review Body’s recommendation to give active consideration to developing innovative pay and workforce proposals that are focussed on maximising outcomes for lowest cost rather than limiting basic pay increases across the board and will consider proposals within public sector pay policy.The Government accepts the recommendation to closely examine the options for making pension packages more flexible where there is a compelling case to do so.Copies have been laid in the Vote Office, the Printed Paper Office and the Libraries of both Houses. We are grateful to the chairman and members of the review body for their work on this year’s report.

HM Treasury

Chlidcare services rollout - update

Elizabeth Truss: We know the cost of childcare is an important issue for working families – that’s why we have made childcare more affordable, given parents more choice and raised standards of provision, supporting parents into work and helping them with the costs they face. In total, the Government will provide over £6 billion of funding per annum in childcare support by 2019-20 to working families and those on low incomes. For parents across the UK, Tax-Free Childcare will cut childcare costs by up to £2,000 per year for each child under 12 years old, or £4,000 per year for disabled children under 17 years old. We introduced the childcare service on 21 April 2017 by accepting applications from parents of children under 4 years old (born on or after 1st September 2013). On 14 July the government extended the service to a cohort of parents with children born on or after 1 April 2013 to ensure that these parents can access the 30 hours offer for their 4 year old child before the start of the school term in September. This enables even more families to benefit from the government’s childcare offer and helps busy families with children under 5 who want to claim a 30 hours free childcare place for September. The Childcare Choices website brings together all the government’s childcare schemes in one place for the first time, and eligible parents can apply for Tax-Free Childcare and 30 hours free childcare through a single and simple application. They can apply for all their children at the same time once their youngest child qualifies, saving time and avoiding the need to provide the same information twice. All eligible parents will be able to apply for Tax-Free Childcare by the end of 2017. Parents can apply via the childcare service for both 30 hours free childcare and Tax-Free Childcare. The application is straightforward and can be accessed via the childcare choices website: https://www.childcarechoices.gov.uk/. To date, over 150,000 parents have successfully applied to the service and over 45,000 childcare providers have signed up.  


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS68

ECOFIN: 11 July 2017

Elizabeth Truss: A meeting of The Economic and Financial Affairs Council (ECOFIN) was held in Brussels on 11 July 2017. The UK was represented by Sir Tim Barrow (Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom to the European Union). European Finance Ministers discussed the following items:Early morning sessionThe Eurogroup President briefed Ministers on the outcomes of the 10 July meeting of the Eurogroup, and Ministers discussed the current economic situation.Current financial service legislative proposalsThe Council Presidency provided an update on current legislative proposals in the field of financial services.Mandatory disclosure rulesThe Commission gave a presentation on the proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive regarding the mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements.Presentation of the work programme of the Estonian Presidency The new Estonian Presidency of the Council of the European Union presented their work programme for the next six months period.Commission Mid-Term Review of the Capital Markets Union Action Plan The Council endorsed Council conclusions on the Mid-Term Review of the Capital Markets Union Action Plan.Non-Performing LoansECOFIN held an exchange of views on policy responses to the Non-Performing Loans situation and endorsed Council conclusions.


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS66

Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport

Telecommunications Council

Matt Hancock: The EU Council of Ministers’ Telecommunications Council took place in Luxembourg on 9 June 2017. Due to the timing of the general election, the UK’s Deputy Permanent Representative to the EU, Katrina Williams, represented the UK at this Council. As is procedure, this Statement sets out a formal record of that meeting.The first item was a progress report and policy debate on the following two legislative instruments:Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (Recast); andProposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications.The Council adopted a General Approach on the Regulation on Cross-Border Parcel Delivery Services. There was a qualified majority in favour.The last main agenda item was the ePrivacy Regulation, on which there was a progress report. There was no substantive debate on this item.These items were followed by information points on: the Roaming Regulation; internet connectivity in local communities (known as ‘WiFi4EU’); the Digital Single Market Strategy; cybersecurity; and the Commission’s EU Digital Progress Report.Finally, the Estonian delegation informed the Council of its priorities for the Estonian Presidency, beginning on 1 July 2017.

Education, Youth, Culture and Sport Council

Matt Hancock: The Education, Youth, Culture and Sport Council took place in Brussels on 22nd and 23rd of May 2017. A separate Ministerial Written Statement is being tabled by the Department for Education concerning the Education Council. The Minister for Digital represented the UK at the Culture section of Council and Katrina Williams, the UK Deputy Permanent Representative to the EU, represented the UK at the Youth and the Sport sections of the Council. As is procedure, this Statement sets out a record of that meeting.YouthThere were two items adopted at the Youth Council. The first pertained to draft conclusions on the role of Youth Work, which the UK supported, and the second which pertained to EU Youth Strategy, which again the UK supported. In addition there was a Resolution on the Structured Dialogue with Young People, which the UK adopted. Furthermore, the Commission pointed to the publication on 30 May of the proposed European Solidarity Corps regulation (a priority of President Juncker) which is designed to broaden the narrow focus of helping young people find employment through volunteer placements. In the policy debate on building Europe’s future, ministers highlighted the need to deepen involvement of young people through effective dialogue and via long-term commitment to funding Erasmus Plus. Finally, there was information from the incoming Estonian Presidency, which stated that it would focus its work programme on ‘smart youth work’ via digital means.CultureThe Council held a minute’s silence to commemorate the victims of the Manchester bombing, with all ministers expressing their condolences to the UK, and many noting that the attack had taken place at a cultural event.The main item at the Council was the Audiovisual Media Services Directive. The Presidency explained why it believed its compromise text to be well-balanced and it was made clear that a general approach would be sought at this Council. The UK was firm that the weakening of the Country of Origin principle remained the main outstanding concern. There was an initial attempt to find a qualified majority with which to support the file, however this failed. As a result, amendments were made to the text on the issues of scope and jurisdiction criteria, and a general approach was agreed, without the support of the UK. This matter will now proceed to trilogue.In addition, the draft Council conclusions on an EU strategic approach to international cultural relations was also adopted, with the agreement of the UK.SportThe Council adopted two conclusions, one regarding Council conclusions on sport as a platform for social inclusion through volunteering, and the other regarding the EU Work Plan for Sport. The UK agreed with the adoption of both sets of Conclusions. In addition, there was feedback from the World Anti-Doping Agency meeting in Montreal and France presented on their candidacy to host the 2024 Olympic Games. There was also a discussion on social inclusion in sport with a presentation from the Premier League. The UK underlined its work to promote inclusion through social media campaigns and major events such as the Paralympics.

Department for Communities and Local Government

Building Safety

Sajid Javid: I would like to update the House on progress with the identification and combustibility testing of Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) cladding on high rise buildings. To date, 259 residential buildings over 18 metres have had samples tested by the Building Research Establishment (BRE), tested by proxy (e.g. are known to be of identical cladding) or have taken their cladding down. None of those tested have passed the limited combustibility test. On the advice of the independent Expert Advisory Panel on Building Safety, the BRE are now undertaking system testing that will help establish how different types of ACM panels in combination with different types of insulation behave in a fire.The figure of 259 includes other residential buildings (such as those in the private sector) but today, I would like to update in particular on those owned by local authorities and housing associations.It is vital to support building owners in ensuring the safety of their residents. This is why the Government, on the advice of the independent Expert Advisory Panel on Building Safety, has offered free of charge testing by the BRE for all residential buildings above 18 metres in height. Local authorities and housing associations were asked to identify residential blocks with ACM cladding and then to submit samples of that cladding material for testing.Local authorities and housing associations initially told us that around 530 towers were thought to have similar cladding to that seen at Grenfell. They have subsequently been physically inspecting the wall materials present on their buildings, and have collected further information which suggests that the actual number of towers that have ACM is much lower. Based on the most recent information we have received, we now think that no more than 240 local authority and housing association towers have ACM cladding and so need to be tested.Aggregating information provided by local authorities, indicates that 46 towers across 16 local authorities have ACM cladding. Of these, 42 have been directly tested through BRE and the other 4 are from identical towers. This means all 46 local authority owned towers with ACM cladding have now had their core material tested for combustibility. All samples have failed the limited combustibility test.Based on the latest information provided by housing associations, up to 194 towers across 50 housing associations have ACM cladding. Of these, 142 have been tested through BRE, through proxy tests or have taken cladding down. We have been told that 12 towers have sent, or will send, their samples to BRE for testing this week. There are 40 towers owned by housing associations who have not confirmed whether ACM cladding is present nor sent ACM samples for testing.  Total ACM towersTotal tested by BRE, by proxy test or with cladding removedSent for testing this weekLocal authorities or housing associations still to confirm whether ACM cladding is presentLocal authority46(16 LAs)4600Housing associationMax. 194(50 HAs)1421240TotalMax. 2401881240Some of these housing associations say that they are still investigating the cladding on their towers. Five weeks is too long to still be investigating. We expect these investigations to be complete and relevant samples sent for testing immediately. There is no excuse for any housing association not to have completed its investigation of cladding materials.To ensure we have a complete picture, we strongly encourage all building owners to provide data where it is currently incomplete or needs updating. Together with the Local Government Association and National Housing Federation we are urgently following up to obtain full information.

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

Sajid Javid: On 26 February 2015, the then Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and the then Secretary of State for Education, exercised their intervention powers as Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council was failing to comply with its best value duty. They made this decision having considered the report of the inspection by Dame Louise Casey CB and advice note from Sir Michael Wilshaw (then HM Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills). Due to the extent and the gravity of the failings in the Council, the then Secretaries of State decided that the intervention should be broad and wide ranging. They directed that Commissioners should exercise all executive functions of the authority, as well as some non-executive ones, including licensing, until the council could exercise them in compliance with its best value duty. A team of Commissioners was appointed to exercise these functions.On the basis of robust evidence of sustainable improvements and confidence that the Council was able to exercise certain functions in compliance with the best value duty, functions have been returned to the Council on three separate occasions - 11 February 2016, 13 December 2016 and 21 March 2017. I am pleased now to be able to report on further progress made.In her 18 May 2017 progress report, Lead Commissioner Mary Ney provided robust evidence to support her recommendation for performance management, human resources (HR), community safety, asset management and waste collection to be returned to the Council. She proposed that the Council would be required to follow any written recommendations made by the Commissioners in relation to any Cabinet decision on services related to domestic abuse services and HR appeals. The latter is time limited. In all other areas, the Council must have regard to any formal advice provided to them by the relevant Commissioner, and if the formal advice is not followed, written reasons must be provided.Today, my officials have written to the Council to say that I am now ‘minded to’ return these service areas to the Council but will seek representations before making a final decision. I am placing a copy of the documents associated with these announcements in the Library of the House and on my Department’s website.

Department of Health

Annual Assessment of NHS England for 2016-17

Mr Jeremy Hunt: Today, I am laying before Parliament my annual assessment of the NHS Commissioning Board (known as NHS England) for 2016-17. A copy is attached. This draws on and responds to NHS England’s Annual Report and Accounts 2016-17, which were laid earlier today (HC101).The Government’s mandate to NHS England sets out the steps that we expect it to take to help deliver our shared vision for the safest, most compassionate, highest quality health system in the world. We recognise that this can only be achieved through the outstanding contribution that the 1.3 million NHS staff across the country make each and every day in delivering care and support for patients, and I would like to pay tribute to their diligence, professionalism and expertise.NHS England’s annual report sets out the progress made in delivering the mandate. It describes an organisation that continues to ensure that high quality care is delivered in the face of rising public demand and cost pressures across the system, and emphasises the need to deliver the Next Steps on the Five Year Forward View to address these challenges. The Government supports the NHS’s plan, including the development of clinically-led and locally-supported Sustainability and Transformation Partnerships.My annual assessment welcomes the good progress that has been made in challenging circumstances, while recognising that there remains a great deal more to do, particularly to improve quality, access and safety whilst maintaining financial sustainability for the future.NHS England’s core aim is to deliver excellence in access and outcomes for patients and, this year, substantial advances have been made across a number of areas, including mental health, maternity care and diabetes prevention. NHS England has also made a significant contribution to overall financial balance in the NHS.However, continued growth in demand has put pressure on services and the NHS is not meeting core patient access standards. This remains a key priority and, to help address this, in 2017-18 NHS England will need to better manage demand, including by working with local government to ensure patients are transferred to more appropriate care when they are fit to leave hospital. To support this, the Government has provided an extra £2 billion for local authority-funded adult social care over the next three years, with £1bn available in 17/18.My assessment sets out the Government’s expectation that the NHS will make further progress in the year ahead on achieving parity of esteem for mental health. Continuing the constructive joint working with NHS Improvement and Health Education England to better manage the challenges the NHS experiences over winter, as well as continuing progress to retain and increase the workforce, will be key. We will also look to NHS England, working with NHS Improvement, to deliver a balanced NHS budget.We will continue to work closely with NHS England to address the significant challenges ahead and provide a sustainable and efficient health service with quality, transparency and safety at its heart.Copies of my annual assessment and NHS England’s annual report will be available from the Vote Office and Printed Paper Office.



Annual Assessment
(PDF Document, 424.65 KB)





This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS69

Towards a Smokefree Generation - A Tobacco Control Plan for England

Steve Brine: The Government has today published the Tobacco Control Plan for England, with a vision to create a smoke free generation. A copy is attached.The 2017-2022 Tobacco Control Plan for England sets the overarching strategic direction for tobacco policy. The last tobacco control plan ran from 2011-2015. All the ambitions set in the previous plan were exceeded, during a period when the Government successfully introduced a significant amount of legislation, including standardised packaging of tobacco products and a ban on smoking in a car when a young person is present.The new plan does not introduce new legislation. Instead, it shifts emphasis from action at the national level such as legislation to focused, local action, supporting smokers, particularly in disadvantaged groups, to quit.The plan lays down bold ambitions for reducing smoking prevalence in England, en route towards creating a smoke free generation. These are:Reduce the prevalence of 15 year olds who regularly smoke from 8% to 3% or less by the end of 2022.Reduce smoking prevalence amongst adults in England from 15.5% to 12% or less by the end of 2022Reduce the inequality gap in smoking prevalence between those in routine and manual occupations and the general population by the end of 2022.Reduce the prevalence of smoking in pregnancy from 10.5% to 6% or less by the end of 2022.



Tobacco Control Plan
(PDF Document, 404.44 KB)




Equalities Analysis
(PDF Document, 278.27 KB)





This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS61

Home Office

Publication of the Report of the QC-led Investigation into the collapse of the 2011 R v ‘Mouncher and others’ trial

Amber Rudd: Richard Horwell QC has submitted to me the report of his investigation into the collapse of the R v ‘Mouncher and others’ 2011 trial (HC 292). I have today laid the report before the House and copies are available from the Vote Office and on www.gov.uk.


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS62

Independent Monitor Annual Report 2015

Sarah Newton: The 2015 Annual report from the Independent Monitor is being published today on www.gov.uk. A copy of the report will also be placed in the House Library.


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS60

Justice & Home Affairs – post-Council statement

Amber Rudd: The first meeting of EU Interior and Justice Ministers during the Estonian Presidency took place on 6 and 7 July in Tallinn. I represented the UK for interior day and the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the rt hon David Lidington MP represented the UK for justice day. Interior day began with a discussion on migration through the Central Mediterranean following the joint French/German/Italian/Commission declaration on 3 July and subsequent publication of the ‘Action Plan on measures to support Italy, reduce pressure along the Central Mediterranean route and increase solidarity’. The UK agrees work must continue on strengthening the EU’s external borders and I joined other Ministers in expressing support for Italian efforts and for the measures proposed in the Action Plan.Ministers then discussed possible developments in EU returns policy. I stressed the UK’s commitment to working with the EU and Member States in this area and expressed support for the proposals, presented by the Presidency, to focus efforts on linking asylum and returns processes, improving the processes for unfounded asylum claims, and ensuring quick returns following quick decisions.Over lunch, Ministers discussed ways of safeguarding the EU’s internal security through cooperation with neighbours. The focus was on how to coordinate EU and Member State activities in helping Ukraine to fight serious and organised crime, improve integrated border management, and counter hybrid threats in order to mitigate possible negative impacts of the security situation in Ukraine on the EU´s internal security. The UK recognises the concerns arising from Russia’s action in Ukraine and I endorsed proposals to step up action to tackle the threat, noting the Conference being held in London on 6 July to galvanise international support for Ukraine’s reform process.Interior day ended with a discussion on next steps on data sharing and interoperability of EU information systems, following the final report of a High Level Expert Group on data sharing, June JHA Council Conclusions on this issue, and the latest Security Union update from the Commission. The Government supports the aim of increasing interoperability of IT systems and ensuring better use of existing data. Member States agreed that interoperability should ultimately increase protection of data, not lessen it, but that clear rules on purpose, access and use were required.Justice day began with an item on data retention. Ministers explored the implications of the Court of Justice of the European Union judgment in the TELE2 / Watson case from December 2016, and the circumstances in which Member States would still be able to require the retention of communications data. The Government has played a leading role in official level discussions on the effects of the judgment. The Justice Secretary led support from Ministers for the continuation of these discussions as a way of carrying out a comprehensive assessment of different options for data retention. The Presidency concluded that work will continue in the Friends of the Presidency group on all possible options.On sale of goods, the Presidency posed three questions: whether the rules on off-line sales should be aligned with those for on-line; whether the digital content rules agreed under the Maltese Presidency were a suitable model; and how to deal with "smart goods" with embedded digital content. The Justice Secretary said that alignment of rules is desirable for business, except in cases where there would be increased costs and in areas where it would lead to decreased consumer protection in the UK legal system. The Justice Secretary also noted that fragmentation of rules for “smart goods” is undesirable and an evidence based approach is necessary given the novelty of the area. The Presidency noted the apparent agreement of EU Ministers to align the rules on off- and on-line sales, and to do so along the lines of the digital content agreement. The Commission said that, in the interests of speed, it would not issue a new proposal to extend the scope of the measure. Rather, it would accept the changes to that end proposed by the Parliament and Council.There was a discussion on e-justice over lunch. The Justice Secretary expressed the UK’s support for the proposal to entrust the management of e-codex (which allows judicial systems to "talk" to each other on-line) to EU-LISA, the agency which manages other large-scale JHA IT systems (such as SIS II), so long as EU-LISA would not be over-burdened and unable to focus on its existing workload. Robust cyber-security would also be necessary. EU Ministers spoke broadly in favour of the proposal, but the Commission will not propose a legal instrument yet.The meeting finished with an exchange of views from Member States on the question of whether the instrument on mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders should be a regulation or a directive. The UK has opted in to this proposal and is committed to working with other Member States and EU agencies in identifying and recovering criminal assets. The Government is neutral on the question of the choice of instrument, but has no objection in principle to a regulation, as long as that regulation does not adversely impact on domestic processes for issuing such orders. Other Member States remain split. The Justice Secretary, supported by other Member States, also noted specific concerns about a proposed new type of asset freezing order.


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS65

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Annual Update to Parliament on UK Support and Funding for International Criminal Justice

Boris Johnson: Monday 17th July marked the Day of International Criminal Justice. This is an opportunity to restate the UK’s strong commitment to the principles of international justice and to reflect on our political and financial support to international justice, including through our support for the International Criminal Court (ICC) and international tribunals.International criminal justice promotes the rule of law and is underpinned by the principle that there should be no impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern such as war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. Over the past year, we have continued to voice our support for these values and taken action to put them into practice.In 2016, we demonstrated the UK’s commitment to international justice by contributing £8.1 million to the ICC; £1.1 million to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY); £400,000 to the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR); and £770,000 to the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (MICT). The UK also contributed £1 million in voluntary funding to the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL), and smaller amounts to the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) and the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone (RSCSL). The UK is delivering practical support for the RSCSL with former Liberian president Charles Taylor serving his sentence for war crimes in a British prison. In December, the UK co-sponsored a UN Resolution to establish the International, Impartial and Independent Mechanism (IIIM) to investigate crimes in Syria and has contributed £200,000 towards its start-up costs. In September 2016, at the UN General Assembly, the Foreign Secretary, alongside the Foreign Ministers of Iraq and Belgium, launched a campaign to bring Daesh to Justice. This is a critical and global effort to ensure Daesh is held accountable for its crimes.Our support is designed to enable the fight against impunity and prosecute those responsible for perpetrating genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. The UK believes that achieving justice for victims should be at the heart of the international community’s response to mass atrocity violence. To this end, the UK contributed £150,000 to the ICC’s Trust Fund for Victims, which provides physical and psychological rehabilitation, material support and reparations to victims and their families.At the ICC, by the end of 2016, there were ten situations under investigation: Uganda, Democratic Republic of Congo, Darfur, Central African Republic I, Kenya, Cote d’Ivoire, Libya, Central African Republic II, Mali and Georgia. In addition, there were ten preliminary examinations: Afghanistan, Colombia, Nigeria, Guinea, Iraq, Burundi, Ukraine, Gabon, the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and Registered Vessels of Comoros, Greece and Cambodia. In 2016, the Court saw its first convictions on the basis of ‘command responsibility’ for the crime of rape, intentionally attacking historic and religious monuments, and for witness and evidence tampering. The Court also made its first substantive award of individual and collective reparations to compensate victims of the DRC war criminal, Germain Katanga.At the ICTY, the UN’s first war crimes tribunal prepares to close its doors at the end of the year. Before closing, the Tribunal is expected to deliver key verdicts in the trial of Ratko Mladić, former Army Commander of the Republika Sprska and in the appeal by six senior Croat military and police officers against their convictions. Like Radovan Karadžić who was sentenced to 40 years’ imprisonment in March 2016, Mladić faces charges of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.When the work of the ICTR ended in 2015, the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals (MICT) took on its remaining functions, ensuring a smooth transition. The MICT will also take on the residual work of the ICTY, including its legacy, at its closure by the end of 2017.This is the fifth annual update to Parliament on the FCO’s work to support international justice.

British Council Annual Report 2016-17

Mark Field: Copies of the British Council’s Annual Report and Accounts for the 2016-17 financial year have been placed in the libraries of both Houses. The Report can also be found at the British Council’s website www.britishcouncil.orgDuring the period the British Council received £158.3million Grant-in-Aid from the Foreign & Commonwealth Office.